#PREPROS UNHELPFUL ERROR MESSAGE PRO#
Really mostly neutral either way - not really decidedly adopting any pro or con When using class X or module X, if the constant X is already defined, Ruby will reopen the class or module definition, so you can operate in the context of the class or module. The messages (as long as they are just warnings, but perhaps also some that relate toĮrrors, in particular when ruby interacts with the user). File mod-reopen-error-message.patch mod-reopen-error-message.patch added The reason for the difference in behavior here is due to Ruby's open classes. The did-you-mean gem and the -w flag for running ruby code, but with more control over In the long run it may be good to sort of have ruby in different "modes" a bit like Similar) situation, if it leads to an improvement such as less confusion for newcomers. The chuck/tail-stock barrier function turned ON, and an axis entered the. I personally do not really need a change either way in the context of this suggestion (IĪm fine with the current behaviour), but I think it is not completely unreasonable toĪssume that there could be use cases for letting ruby be more verbose in this (or Correct any setting error of the parameters for the stored stroke limit. Variables may be assigned to nil, without explicit " x = nil". Some behaviour in ruby can be confusing to newcomers, such as when I think this depends on what the ruby user at hand is doing and how much expertise that Picat's cp solver reads and 'loads' the constraints incrementally which can be faster since it can then reduce the domains after reading a constraint. I would appreciate feedback on whether this more detailed error message is an improvement.
#PREPROS UNHELPFUL ERROR MESSAGE PATCH#
Attached is a patch that changes the error message to the include the current class of the object: class X end module X end # TypeError (X is not a module, it is a Class) module Y end class Y end # TypeError (Y is not a class, it is a Module) It is possible to change the format the error message, though. Likewise, the error raised when attempting to reopening an existing constant is pretty much the same for all objects that don't match the expected type: X = 1 class X end # TypeError (X is not a class) module X end # TypeError (X is not a module) new # warning: already initialized constant X # warning: previous definition of X was here In the server.log I'm finding the (unhelpful) error. The warning message you get during constant reassignment is used for classes and modules if you assign them: X = Class. Occasionally the PyKmip server can't find the requested keys. However, attempting to reopen a class when the object is not actually a class is a error, whereas reassigning a constant is just a warning. The reason for the difference in behavior here is due to Ruby's open classes.
0 kommentar(er)
